Shoppers on Wicklow Street in Dublin, Ireland on Thursday March 28, 2024.
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images
A landmark ruling by the European Union’s top court means Ireland will receive 13 billion euros ($14.4 billion) in unpaid taxes from Apple – a windfall that Dublin had spent years fighting to avoid.
It leaves the small EU member state in a politically awkward, if enviable, position. Irish lawmakers are expected to determine how best to spend the incoming cash infusion before a general election, which must be held no later than March next year.
In a decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) he said was final, the EU’s top court ruled on Tuesday that Apple must pay Ireland billions of euros in back taxes.
The decision was welcomed by tax justice advocates as well as the bloc’s outgoing competition chief Margrethe Vestager, who is described declaring it a “huge victory” for European citizens.
Apple he said in a statement that it is disappointed with the decision, while the Irish government is described the case as “a matter now of only historical importance.”
The Irish government said in a statement that its position has always been that it “does not give preferential tax treatment to any company or taxpayer”. A spokesman added that the process of transferring the assets held in an escrow fund in Ireland would now begin.
European Union antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager gives a press conference after Europe’s top court ruled on Apple’s fight against an order by EU competition regulators to pay a record €13 billion in taxes to Ireland, in Brussels , Belgium, 10 September 2024.
Johanna Geron | Reuters
“The Irish government in particular is now in a position where they are telling the Irish people and the international community that they don’t want that 13 billion [euros] — it’s not ours,” Aidan Regan, an associate professor of political economy at University College Dublin in Ireland, told CNBC by phone.
“They’re facing a lot of internal pressure politically, there’s an election probably in a couple of months and now they’ve potentially got a windfall of £13bn. [euros] in a context where there are huge infrastructure problems and a housing crisis,” he continued.
“So I suspect the Irish government will be paying far less attention to what is happening internationally and the reputational cost of this decision and wondering what they are going to say to the Irish electorate ahead of an election in a few weeks. “
A spokesman for Ireland’s finance ministry referred CNBC to the government’s written statement when reached for comment.
A profitable decision
Ireland, which serves as Apple’s EU base, has one of the lowest corporate tax rates in the bloc of 27 nations.
For years, Ireland has consistently argued that the iPhone maker did not have to pay back unpaid taxes to the country. He had challenged the case amid fears it could threaten the country’s ability to attract investment from companies keen to limit their taxation of overseas profits.
However, the ECJ’s ruling on Tuesday confirmed the European Commission’s 2016 ruling that the country had provided the US tech behemoth with “illegal aid which Ireland must recover”.
The decision comes at a time when Ireland are in the unusual position of running a fiscal surplus multi-billion euro, partly due to strong corporate taxation.
Taoiseach Simon Harris awaits the arrival of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer for a meeting at Farmleigh, the official Irish state guest house in Dublin, ahead of the Republic of Ireland v England football match in the Irish capital.
Brian Lawless – Pa Images | Pa Images | Getty Images
“The decision is lucrative for Ireland, resulting in a windfall for the country, but undermines the government’s long-standing position that Ireland does not provide preferential tax treatment to taxpayers, companies or others,” said Robert Dever, tax partner at Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons told CNBC via email.
“We would hope that any damage to Ireland’s reputation internationally will be limited given the changes to the Irish tax code, including the rules on corporate tax residence and the attribution of profits to branches of non-resident companies, in recent years,” Dever said. .
“The process of transferring the assets to the escrow fund, set up to hold funds representing the tax liability and interest allegedly owed by Apple pending a final decision, in Ireland will now begin following today’s decision, but it will take some months to finalize,” he added.
Tax cooperation
Alex Cobham, chief executive of the Tax Justice Network, which monitors corporate tax avoidance, said on Tuesday that he welcomed the ECJ’s ruling on Apple’s tax cases in Ireland.
“But the ruling only serves to highlight the abject failure of international tax rules to protect the right of countries to tax economic activity within their own jurisdictions,” Cobham told CNBC via email.
“This shows the urgency of the global reform process now underway through the negotiation of a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation,” he added.
Shoppers and staff are seen inside the Apple Store, with its sleek modern interior design and prominent Apple logo on September 10, 2024 in Chongqing, China.
Cheng Xin | Getty Images
Separately, Chiara Putaturo, EU tax expert at global poverty charity Oxfam, said on Tuesday that the ECJ ruling “exposes the love affair of EU tax havens with multinationals”.
“This decision should not stand alone as a single victory – it should force the EU to close all the loopholes that allow companies to avoid paying their fair share of tax,” Putaturo said in a statement.
“It’s time to end this drain on government coffers and put that revenue into fighting the climate crisis and building hospitals, schools and other services for the people.”